SlideShare a Scribd company logo
The Future of Viewability
November 2012


Executive Summary
Ad viewability has emerged as a core challenge for marketers hoping to quantify and validate their online display
investment. Given the advancements in technology that often outpace our ability to measure it, online advertising
has lagged in its ability to assure that an impression does in fact mean that a user has viewed the creative. This is
of chief concern for brands that are paying for ad space on a CPM basis, in which a “below the fold” impression
may be counted without considering viewability.

Online ad viewability is a complex concept with several stakeholders ranging from brands and agencies to ad
networks and measurement vendors. The “Making Measurement Make Sense” (3MS) initiative was created last
year under the leadership of key industry organizations such as the IAB, the 4As, the ANA and MediaLink. The
core purpose of this partnership is “to propose standards for metrics and advertising currency that will enhance
evaluation of digital media and facilitate cross-platform comparison for brand marketing.”

The existence of this consortium of influential industry stakeholders is critical towards advancing key
standardization initiatives and ensuring widespread participation and adoption. This spring, 3MS engaged Bain
Consulting and the Media Ratings Council (MRC) to manage a pilot program focused on the topic of ad viewability,
of which 360i was an active participant.


Key Takeaways

1   The viewable ad impressions metric is a necessary evolution to the online advertising model. Adoption
    of the ad viewability metric will ensure marketers understand the real impact of their media investment. Brand
    marketers paying top-dollar for high-quality inventory will be able to confirm that their investment garners
    strong ad view, and direct response advertisers will be able to track viewability levels against conversion-
    oriented results.


2   Measuring viewability is an ongoing pursuit that will be pushed forward by innovators, with greater
    polish and evolution emerging as more people adopt the new metrics. As for now, the pilot uncovered
    challenges that must be overcome before ad viewability will be embraced. For example, the number of
    impressions that could not be measured for viewability poses a significant challenge. This and other
    challenges underscore the need for further investigation before viewable impressions can become an
    accepted metric pan-industry.


3   The implications of a standardized viewability metric are substantial and tremendously positive for
    publishers and consumers alike. The ad viewability metric will shift how the industry perceives the
    monetization of online real estate. As the finite world of TV inventory commands higher CPMs, a more
    “scarce” supply of premium online inventory (as determined by high viewability rates) will likely do the same as
    it simultaneously improves the consumer experience by de-cluttering web pages.




                                                                                                                        1
                                              ? 360i LLC. All Rights Reserved.
360i fully embraces the efforts being made by 3MS to advance the cause for better measurement and
standardization in digital media. Viewability is a pivotal component that will allow marketers to collectively evolve
into a more apples-to-apples cross channel attribution system, which is the Holy Grail of successful marketing.
This report will outline the challenge of viewability and share key results from the pilot program.



Introduction: What is Viewability?
Online advertising has pressed for progress in nearly every medium when it comes to driving advanced
accountability and trackability, but there is one area where the industry has fallen blatantly short – ad viewability.
What is the value of an online ad unit if no one ever sees it? This challenge is the chief reason why 3MS was
established in 2011.

As you consider the origins of viewability as a meaningful metric, take a look at the screenshot below, which shows
the bottom third of the CNN.com homepage. If a user never scrolls all the way down the page, he or she will never
see these ad units. Yet standard ad-serving technologies still count this ad load as an impression, and potentially
assign conversion credit on a post-view basis – regardless of whether the ad was truly ever in view.




The 3MS initiative was created to enhance and standardize digital metrics and establish a measurement
governance model that allows for cross-platform comparison. As part of this effort, the group has created “5
Guiding Principles of Digital Measurement.” The first principle, regarding a new standard of viewable impressions,
serves as the core focus of this report.

         Principle #1 – Move to a “viewable impressions” standard and count real exposures online.
         Today we count “served impressions” as recorded by ad servers. Often, ad units are not in a viewable
         space to the end-user or fail to fully load on the screen – potentially resulting in substantial over-counting
         of impressions. Viewable exposures are increasingly the norm across other media and better address the
         needs of brand marketers. (Source: 3MS)




                                                                                                                          2
The following section outlines 360i’s participation in the 3MS agency pilot program related to viewability.



About the 3MS Pilot Program
The primary goal of the 3MS initiative is to phase out the industry’s dependence on the ad impressions-served
metric and replace it with the viewable impressions metric.

The viewable impressions metric, as preliminarily defined during publisher pilot programs, focuses on two factors:
area and duration. By this standard, a viewable impression is reported when at least 50 percent of the ad content
on a web page is within the visible area of the viewer's browser window for one second or more.

Supervised by the Media Ratings Council (MRC), the agency-focused pilot was designed to uncover and address
several aspects of the proposed transition to a viewable impression. The pilot was designed to assess advertiser
campaigns in live environments and test viewable impression parameters in order to better understand
measurement limitations. Several agencies were selected to participate (including 360i), alongside measurement
and ad serving providers, during a trial period in May-June 2012. MRC provided pilot management support and
unbiased analysis of the pilot results.

A total of 17 advertisers and 12 agencies participated in pilot across 22 campaigns, representing more than 3
billion served impressions that ran in variety of different environments.



Results & Reactions
Data released by the MRC to pilot participants revealed the following key findings.

    1.   Viewability rates – or, the percentage of impressions for which the viewable/non-viewable status
         was determined – varied widely by campaign; from a high of 78.6 percent to a low of 7.3 percent. The
         graph below shows varying viewability rates across 22 campaigns measured in this study.



                                                                               Viewable Rate
           100%
            90%
                                                       78.6%
            80%
                                                                                                  66.6%           68.1%                                                          67.1%
            70%
                                                                                       58.3% 57.4%                                58.3%
            60%
            50%                                43.7%
                                                               41.1%                                      43.4%                                   44.3%
                  38.3%                                                        38.4%                                                                             38.4%
            40%                                                                                                                                                          33.7%
                       26.7%                                           27.1%
            30%                        21.0%
                               14.7%                                                                                      15.1%           15.7%
            20%
                                                                                                                                                          7.3%
            10%
             0%
                   1      2      3       4       5       6       7       8       9      10   11      12    13      14      15      16      17      18      19     20      21      22

                                                                                     Campaign


    2.   The percentage of served impressions measured for viewability ranged from a low of 0 percent to
         a high of 76.7 percent. Note: In this chart, the X-axis still represents campaigns, but this time using



                                                                                                                                                                                         3
letters since the chart above and this one are not one-to-one. Some participants sharing viewability results
     did not share measurability results, resulting in a discrepancy in the total number of campaigns tracked.


                                                         Measured Rate
      100%
        90%
                                                                                                76.7%
        80%
                                                                                       68.5%
        70%                                                    62.9%
                                                                                                                               59.7%
        60%
        50%
        40%                                            34.1%                                                           32.9%
                                              26.0%                    27.3%
        30%
              17.2%           15.7%                                            16.1%
        20%           14.4%           12.6%
        10%                                                                                             0.0%
                                                                                                                2.8%
         0%
                A      B       C       D       E        F       G       H        I       J        K      L       M      N       O

                                                               Campaign



3.   Cross-domain iFrames presented a significant challenge to viewability measurement; they were the
     cause of the 73.1 percent of the unmeasured impressions in Network and 37.3 percent of unmeasured
     impressions in Publisher placements.



                Unmeasured Impressions Percentage within Cross-Domain iFrames
      100%
        90%
                                       26.9%
        80%
        70%                                                                                             62.7%
        60%
        50%
        40%
                                       73.1%
        30%
        20%                                                                                             37.3%
        10%
         0%
                              Network Placements                                               Publisher Placements

                                                      % in iFrames       % not in iFrames




                                                                                                                                       4
4.   Network placements in pilot programs generally had lower measured and viewable rates.



                                  Network Placements vs. Publisher Placements
          60%                                                                                55.2%

          50%

          40%
                                                                            32.1%
          30%                                 26.8%

                            18.9%
          20%

          10%

           0%
                                  Measured Rate                                  Viewable Rate

                                           Network Placement    Publisher Placement



    5.   Viewable rates in pilot programs varied by ad size.



                                          Viewable Rates by Ad Unit Size
          70%       63.7%
                                                                                                      58.8%
          60%
                                                                              52.5%
                              49.0%
          50%
                                                                                           40.0%
          40%

          30%
                                                                    19.8%
          20%
                                            12.6%
          10%
                                                        0.0%
           0%
                        160x600                   180x150              300x250                   728x90

                                           Network Placement    Publisher Placement



The number of impressions that could not be measured for viewability poses a significant problem. Across some
campaigns, that figure exceeded the number of viewable and non-viewable impressions combined. Measured
impression rates showed no similarities across campaigns and were very low in some cases.

The majority of unmeasured impressions were the result of cross-domain iFrames, due to the viewable impression
code being served through a different domain than the publisher’s site. If the domain of the iFrame is different from
the domain of the page, the impression is not measurable. Network placements were affected more negatively by
cross-domain iFrames than the publisher placements.

Moreover, a portion of unmeasured impressions could not be attributed to any known fact. Other contributing
factors to the unmeasurable served impressions were that not all viewable vendors met the 17 validation criteria,



                                                                                                                        5
or the viewable decision tags failed to “fire.” In addition to the problem of measurability, campaigns’ viewability
rates varied greatly across campaigns, suggesting that strategies to maximize viewability have a long way to go.

The pilot revealed the challenges ahead and underscored the need for further investigation before viewable
impressions can become an accepted metric across the industry. Like all aspects of digital advertising, measuring
viewability is a technical challenge that requires perfecting before marketers can accurately and confidently
calculate the impressions that are truly viewable. In the case of not being able to measure served impressions 100
percent, the industry will need to come to a level of measurability that is at least projectable. Currently, there are
too many unknowns to make informed projections.

Measuring viewability is also an accountability challenge. Unfortunately, not all vendors participating in the pilot
were able to meet the validation criteria. Maximizing viewability will not only require additional studies, but the
assurance that viewability measurers are validated under and held to strict guidelines. As more served
impressions can be measured for viewability, a fuller understanding of viewability rates and the finalization of an
industry standard will be in closer reach.



Implications
This pilot program is just one phase of the overall evolution that 3MS is hoping to accomplish. The following are
what we perceive to be the short and long-term implications of this pilot program on both the digital industry and
the overall media landscape:


Near-term implications:
    1.   Key players will push adoption of viewability. Even before the agency pilot program wrapped, industry
         leaders in research and measurement has already begun to push usage of the new metric. For example,
         comScore is working with agencies on partnerships that incorporate viewability into campaign
         measurement, and AdSafe is also offering a viewability product. Even some publishers, such as ESPN,
         are experimenting with viewable currency models. As more credible vendors promote this concept,
         viewability will become a part of our industry’s common vernacular.

    2.   Marketers will benefit from enhanced optimization and negotiation tools. For both brand and direct
         response-oriented campaigns, marketers will have new insight into their display investment. Brand
         advertisers who pay premium CPMs for high-quality inventory will be able to ensure that their investments
         are garnering strong ad view (and publishers will be able to adjust CPMs accordingly). The effects will be
         more palpable for direct response campaigns, where ad viewability proved to fall at lower percentages
         due to the relatively low viewability rates for networks as compared to premium publishers (32 vs. 55
         percent).

         Media professionals would be well-served to compare their network viewability levels against their
         conversion-oriented results. If a correlation exists, this is something that can be used for strategic
         optimizations designed to enhance the efficiencies of the campaign. As less wasteful ad impressions are
         served, potential monetary savings on the ad serving front may be achieved, and ultimately less
         conversion overlap.




                                                                                                                         6
Long-term implications:
    1.   Ad technologies will evolve to allow for better measures of viewability. As noted above, one of the
         more unintended findings from the pilot program was the extreme gap in measurable vs. unmeasurable
         impressions. Since this is the basic foundation for widespread adoption of viewability standards, the IAB is
         working to resolve issues related to cross-domain iFrames that render viewability impossible. The solution
         currently under way is a “safe iFrame,” which the IAB intends to release on Nov. 5, and has already begun
         distributing to agency ad operations teams, including that of 360i.

    2.   The industry will migrate towards the digital GRP. According to the 3MS website, as early as
         November 2012, marketers should begin to see digital gross rating points (GRPs) take form beyond some
         initial experimented use by comScore (vGRP) and Nielsen (eGRP). The IAB predicts broad industry
         adoption by April 2013. This will only be possible with the adoption of a standardized viewable impression
         metric.

    3.   Publishers and agencies will begin to favor scarcity. An enormous positive outcome that will stem
         from this new way of thinking about ad impressions is that the industry will shift its current approach to the
         monetization of online real estate. A recent ClickZ article highlights an interesting notion that traditional
         advertisers are well accustomed to, which is that the finite universe of TV inventory is what commands its
         high CPMs. Conversely, the seemingly boundless display impression universe has translated to a system
         where online advertising has perhaps “overmonetized” its real estate, thus driving overall CPMs
         downwards. As marketers begin to press for a higher level of confirmed viewable ad impressions, we will
         ultimately de-emphasize waste and re-prioritize only the most valuable inventory.

While the possibility of a more seamless integration of cross-channel metrics is a huge boon for marketers, it’s
important to not overlook what just might be the most profound potential impact of a new viewability metric: how it
may change the experience for consumers. As this industry matures, much like other mediums have had to do,
there comes a time to reassess and perhaps “un-think” some of the bad habits developed over time – for online
advertising, this means cluttered web pages. Viewability has the potential to shift the entire way of thinking around
how a website is designed and optimized for a positive ad experience.

As a practical move forward, 360i will be actively incorporating measurement tools and technologies into media
recommendations as appropriate for clients and will continue to monitor the space for any further outcomes
stemming from this pilot program.



Next Steps
Our recommendations for some quick wins that marketers can take as far as incorporating viewability into their
campaigns are as follows:

    ?    Prioritize campaigns which are heavily direct response-oriented. These are the campaigns where the
         highest shortfall in viewability was evident.

    ?    Partner with a research company who offers a viewable impression validation suite. Both RealVu
         and comScore are accredited by the MRC, and others have actively participated in the pilot indicating they
         are likely to follow.



                                                                                                                          7
?   Factor viewed impressions into optimizations. While it may be a longer road towards negotiating
        based on a paid viewed impression, marketers and agencies are in the driver’s seat in terms of controlling
        campaign budgets.



About 360i
360i is an award-winning digital marketing agency that drives results for Fortune 500 marketers through insights,
ideas and technologies. 360i helps its clients think differently about their online presence and evolve their
strategies to take advantage of the new world of marketing communications – one where brands and consumers
engage in interactive and multi-directional conversations. In 2010, Ad Age named 360i to its prestigious Agency A-
List. Current clients include Kraft Foods, JCPenney, Coca-Cola, NBC Universal and Diageo, among others. For
more information, please visit www.360i.com or follow us on Twitter @360i.



Ways To Connect With 360i
        360i.com/reports              blog.360i.com                 twitter.com/360i               editor@360i.com




                                                                                                                     8

More Related Content

What's hot

Com score lessons learned
Com score lessons learnedCom score lessons learned
Com score lessons learned
electionfox
?
2015 Q4 Media Quality Report
2015 Q4 Media Quality Report2015 Q4 Media Quality Report
2015 Q4 Media Quality Report
Integral Ad Science
?
Ccpd stakeholder input process 01 13-12
Ccpd stakeholder input process 01 13-12Ccpd stakeholder input process 01 13-12
Ccpd stakeholder input process 01 13-12
Brandon Williams
?
How To Develop Smart Mobile Marketing Strategies
How To Develop Smart Mobile Marketing StrategiesHow To Develop Smart Mobile Marketing Strategies
How To Develop Smart Mobile Marketing Strategies
bnikolaou
?
Quantcast-Advertise-AdQuality-WhitePaper-May2015
Quantcast-Advertise-AdQuality-WhitePaper-May2015Quantcast-Advertise-AdQuality-WhitePaper-May2015
Quantcast-Advertise-AdQuality-WhitePaper-May2015
Marina Feldman
?
How to Optimize for Brand Effectiveness: Before & During Your Campaign
How to Optimize for Brand Effectiveness: Before & During Your CampaignHow to Optimize for Brand Effectiveness: Before & During Your Campaign
How to Optimize for Brand Effectiveness: Before & During Your Campaign
Extreme Reach
?
Mobile2012 L2 Think Tank
Mobile2012 L2 Think TankMobile2012 L2 Think Tank
Mobile2012 L2 Think Tank
Henri Kaufman
?
Mobilize your creativity - Eyal Rabinovich.docx
Mobilize your creativity - Eyal Rabinovich.docxMobilize your creativity - Eyal Rabinovich.docx
Mobilize your creativity - Eyal Rabinovich.docx
DevGAMM Conference
?

What's hot (8)

Com score lessons learned
Com score lessons learnedCom score lessons learned
Com score lessons learned
?
2015 Q4 Media Quality Report
2015 Q4 Media Quality Report2015 Q4 Media Quality Report
2015 Q4 Media Quality Report
?
Ccpd stakeholder input process 01 13-12
Ccpd stakeholder input process 01 13-12Ccpd stakeholder input process 01 13-12
Ccpd stakeholder input process 01 13-12
?
How To Develop Smart Mobile Marketing Strategies
How To Develop Smart Mobile Marketing StrategiesHow To Develop Smart Mobile Marketing Strategies
How To Develop Smart Mobile Marketing Strategies
?
Quantcast-Advertise-AdQuality-WhitePaper-May2015
Quantcast-Advertise-AdQuality-WhitePaper-May2015Quantcast-Advertise-AdQuality-WhitePaper-May2015
Quantcast-Advertise-AdQuality-WhitePaper-May2015
?
How to Optimize for Brand Effectiveness: Before & During Your Campaign
How to Optimize for Brand Effectiveness: Before & During Your CampaignHow to Optimize for Brand Effectiveness: Before & During Your Campaign
How to Optimize for Brand Effectiveness: Before & During Your Campaign
?
Mobile2012 L2 Think Tank
Mobile2012 L2 Think TankMobile2012 L2 Think Tank
Mobile2012 L2 Think Tank
?
Mobilize your creativity - Eyal Rabinovich.docx
Mobilize your creativity - Eyal Rabinovich.docxMobilize your creativity - Eyal Rabinovich.docx
Mobilize your creativity - Eyal Rabinovich.docx
?

Similar to 360i Report: The Future of Viewability

Automotive Digital Marketing Search Marketing Combined Strategy
Automotive Digital Marketing Search Marketing Combined StrategyAutomotive Digital Marketing Search Marketing Combined Strategy
Automotive Digital Marketing Search Marketing Combined Strategy
Ralph Paglia
?
Comscore vce brandingmetrics vn-2012-11-02
Comscore vce brandingmetrics vn-2012-11-02Comscore vce brandingmetrics vn-2012-11-02
Comscore vce brandingmetrics vn-2012-11-02
Long Nguyen
?
Ad Mob Mobile Metrics Mar 10 Publisher Survey
Ad Mob Mobile Metrics Mar 10 Publisher SurveyAd Mob Mobile Metrics Mar 10 Publisher Survey
Ad Mob Mobile Metrics Mar 10 Publisher Survey
Anna
?
Next-Generation Campaign Section Title Validation & Optimization
Next-Generation Campaign Section Title Validation & OptimizationNext-Generation Campaign Section Title Validation & Optimization
Next-Generation Campaign Section Title Validation & Optimization
Vivastream
?
Yearly Marketing Survey 2011
Yearly Marketing Survey 2011Yearly Marketing Survey 2011
Yearly Marketing Survey 2011
The House of Marketing
?
Sprint's Next Generation Campaign Validation & Optimization
Sprint's Next Generation Campaign Validation & OptimizationSprint's Next Generation Campaign Validation & Optimization
Sprint's Next Generation Campaign Validation & Optimization
Vivastream
?
Q1 2010 EMAIL TRENDS AND BENCHMARKS
Q1 2010 EMAIL TRENDS AND BENCHMARKSQ1 2010 EMAIL TRENDS AND BENCHMARKS
Q1 2010 EMAIL TRENDS AND BENCHMARKS
marketingradar
?
The Silent Click: Building Brands Online
The Silent Click: Building Brands OnlineThe Silent Click: Building Brands Online
The Silent Click: Building Brands Online
Dmytro Lysiuk
?
The Silent Click Opa
The Silent Click OpaThe Silent Click Opa
The Silent Click Opa
guest0c45227
?
The Silent Click - Building Brands Online
The Silent Click - Building Brands OnlineThe Silent Click - Building Brands Online
The Silent Click - Building Brands Online
Sionne Roberts
?
Sprint's Next Generation Campaign Validation & Optimization
Sprint's Next Generation Campaign Validation & OptimizationSprint's Next Generation Campaign Validation & Optimization
Sprint's Next Generation Campaign Validation & Optimization
Vivastream
?
Peter Field - IPA DATAbank
Peter Field - IPA DATAbankPeter Field - IPA DATAbank
Peter Field - IPA DATAbank
MediaCom Edinburgh
?
The rules of mobile advertising
The rules of mobile advertisingThe rules of mobile advertising
The rules of mobile advertising
Seungyul Kim
?
Pepperdine cost of capital national summit 10 18 2011
Pepperdine cost of capital national summit 10 18 2011Pepperdine cost of capital national summit 10 18 2011
Pepperdine cost of capital national summit 10 18 2011
Pepperdine University Graziadio School of Business and Management
?
Pepperdine cost of capital national summit 10 18 2011
Pepperdine cost of capital national summit 10 18 2011Pepperdine cost of capital national summit 10 18 2011
Pepperdine cost of capital national summit 10 18 2011
Pepperdine University Graziadio School of Business and Management
?
Pepperdine cost of capital national summit 10 18 2011
Pepperdine cost of capital national summit 10 18 2011Pepperdine cost of capital national summit 10 18 2011
Pepperdine cost of capital national summit 10 18 2011
Pepperdine University Graziadio School of Business and Management
?
Digital Pharma 2010
Digital Pharma 2010Digital Pharma 2010
Digital Pharma 2010
Tangent 90 Ltd
?
The death of the click (с) Osnat Zaretsky
The death of the click (с) Osnat ZaretskyThe death of the click (с) Osnat Zaretsky
The death of the click (с) Osnat Zaretsky
HUNGRY BOYS Creative agency
?
The Death of The Click - Conde Nast Russia 13.04.11
The Death of The Click  -  Conde Nast Russia 13.04.11The Death of The Click  -  Conde Nast Russia 13.04.11
The Death of The Click - Conde Nast Russia 13.04.11
Osnat Ben-Nesher Zaretsky
?
ClickSquared Webcast: Improve your Marketing, Remove the Complexity
ClickSquared Webcast: Improve your Marketing, Remove the ComplexityClickSquared Webcast: Improve your Marketing, Remove the Complexity
ClickSquared Webcast: Improve your Marketing, Remove the Complexity
ClickSquared
?

Similar to 360i Report: The Future of Viewability (20)

Automotive Digital Marketing Search Marketing Combined Strategy
Automotive Digital Marketing Search Marketing Combined StrategyAutomotive Digital Marketing Search Marketing Combined Strategy
Automotive Digital Marketing Search Marketing Combined Strategy
?
Comscore vce brandingmetrics vn-2012-11-02
Comscore vce brandingmetrics vn-2012-11-02Comscore vce brandingmetrics vn-2012-11-02
Comscore vce brandingmetrics vn-2012-11-02
?
Ad Mob Mobile Metrics Mar 10 Publisher Survey
Ad Mob Mobile Metrics Mar 10 Publisher SurveyAd Mob Mobile Metrics Mar 10 Publisher Survey
Ad Mob Mobile Metrics Mar 10 Publisher Survey
?
Next-Generation Campaign Section Title Validation & Optimization
Next-Generation Campaign Section Title Validation & OptimizationNext-Generation Campaign Section Title Validation & Optimization
Next-Generation Campaign Section Title Validation & Optimization
?
Yearly Marketing Survey 2011
Yearly Marketing Survey 2011Yearly Marketing Survey 2011
Yearly Marketing Survey 2011
?
Sprint's Next Generation Campaign Validation & Optimization
Sprint's Next Generation Campaign Validation & OptimizationSprint's Next Generation Campaign Validation & Optimization
Sprint's Next Generation Campaign Validation & Optimization
?
Q1 2010 EMAIL TRENDS AND BENCHMARKS
Q1 2010 EMAIL TRENDS AND BENCHMARKSQ1 2010 EMAIL TRENDS AND BENCHMARKS
Q1 2010 EMAIL TRENDS AND BENCHMARKS
?
The Silent Click: Building Brands Online
The Silent Click: Building Brands OnlineThe Silent Click: Building Brands Online
The Silent Click: Building Brands Online
?
The Silent Click Opa
The Silent Click OpaThe Silent Click Opa
The Silent Click Opa
?
The Silent Click - Building Brands Online
The Silent Click - Building Brands OnlineThe Silent Click - Building Brands Online
The Silent Click - Building Brands Online
?
Sprint's Next Generation Campaign Validation & Optimization
Sprint's Next Generation Campaign Validation & OptimizationSprint's Next Generation Campaign Validation & Optimization
Sprint's Next Generation Campaign Validation & Optimization
?
Peter Field - IPA DATAbank
Peter Field - IPA DATAbankPeter Field - IPA DATAbank
Peter Field - IPA DATAbank
?
The rules of mobile advertising
The rules of mobile advertisingThe rules of mobile advertising
The rules of mobile advertising
?
Pepperdine cost of capital national summit 10 18 2011
Pepperdine cost of capital national summit 10 18 2011Pepperdine cost of capital national summit 10 18 2011
Pepperdine cost of capital national summit 10 18 2011
?
Pepperdine cost of capital national summit 10 18 2011
Pepperdine cost of capital national summit 10 18 2011Pepperdine cost of capital national summit 10 18 2011
Pepperdine cost of capital national summit 10 18 2011
?
Pepperdine cost of capital national summit 10 18 2011
Pepperdine cost of capital national summit 10 18 2011Pepperdine cost of capital national summit 10 18 2011
Pepperdine cost of capital national summit 10 18 2011
?
Digital Pharma 2010
Digital Pharma 2010Digital Pharma 2010
Digital Pharma 2010
?
The death of the click (с) Osnat Zaretsky
The death of the click (с) Osnat ZaretskyThe death of the click (с) Osnat Zaretsky
The death of the click (с) Osnat Zaretsky
?
The Death of The Click - Conde Nast Russia 13.04.11
The Death of The Click  -  Conde Nast Russia 13.04.11The Death of The Click  -  Conde Nast Russia 13.04.11
The Death of The Click - Conde Nast Russia 13.04.11
?
ClickSquared Webcast: Improve your Marketing, Remove the Complexity
ClickSquared Webcast: Improve your Marketing, Remove the ComplexityClickSquared Webcast: Improve your Marketing, Remove the Complexity
ClickSquared Webcast: Improve your Marketing, Remove the Complexity
?

More from 360i

Smart Hardware Cheatsheet
Smart Hardware CheatsheetSmart Hardware Cheatsheet
Smart Hardware Cheatsheet
360i
?
The DEN Atlanta
The DEN AtlantaThe DEN Atlanta
The DEN Atlanta
360i
?
The DEN Chicago
The DEN ChicagoThe DEN Chicago
The DEN Chicago
360i
?
360i's Digital Education for Nonprofits (the den) Recap Report
360i's Digital Education for Nonprofits (the den) Recap Report360i's Digital Education for Nonprofits (the den) Recap Report
360i's Digital Education for Nonprofits (the den) Recap Report
360i
?
360i SXSW Interactive 2016 Roundup
360i SXSW Interactive 2016 Roundup 360i SXSW Interactive 2016 Roundup
360i SXSW Interactive 2016 Roundup
360i
?
360i SXSW Cheat-Sheet
360i SXSW Cheat-Sheet360i SXSW Cheat-Sheet
360i SXSW Cheat-Sheet
360i
?
Social Platform Cheat Sheet February 2016
Social Platform Cheat Sheet February 2016 Social Platform Cheat Sheet February 2016
Social Platform Cheat Sheet February 2016
360i
?
The 2016 CES Report: The Trend Behind the Trend
The 2016 CES Report: The Trend Behind the TrendThe 2016 CES Report: The Trend Behind the Trend
The 2016 CES Report: The Trend Behind the Trend
360i
?
Social platform cheat_sheet 4.0
Social platform cheat_sheet 4.0 Social platform cheat_sheet 4.0
Social platform cheat_sheet 4.0
360i
?
Marketing Leadership Playbook 2015
Marketing Leadership Playbook 2015Marketing Leadership Playbook 2015
Marketing Leadership Playbook 2015
360i
?
Social platform cheat_sheet_august_2015
Social platform cheat_sheet_august_2015Social platform cheat_sheet_august_2015
Social platform cheat_sheet_august_2015
360i
?
Social platform cheat_sheet_may_2015
Social platform cheat_sheet_may_2015Social platform cheat_sheet_may_2015
Social platform cheat_sheet_may_2015
360i
?
2015 SXSW Interactive Recap
2015 SXSW Interactive Recap2015 SXSW Interactive Recap
2015 SXSW Interactive Recap
360i
?
360i SXSW Cheat-sheet
360i SXSW Cheat-sheet360i SXSW Cheat-sheet
360i SXSW Cheat-sheet
360i
?
360i's Branded Video Content Cheat-sheet
360i's Branded Video Content Cheat-sheet360i's Branded Video Content Cheat-sheet
360i's Branded Video Content Cheat-sheet
360i
?
360i's 2015 International CES Hot List
360i's 2015 International CES Hot List360i's 2015 International CES Hot List
360i's 2015 International CES Hot List
360i
?
Social Platform Cheat Sheet
Social Platform Cheat SheetSocial Platform Cheat Sheet
Social Platform Cheat Sheet
360i
?
Global Twitter Trends: Brazil
Global Twitter Trends: BrazilGlobal Twitter Trends: Brazil
Global Twitter Trends: Brazil
360i
?
360i Culture Slideware
360i Culture Slideware360i Culture Slideware
360i Culture Slideware360i
?
Why Mariah Carey is a Better Brand Than You (or 5 Things Brands Can Learn fro...
Why Mariah Carey is a Better Brand Than You (or 5 Things Brands Can Learn fro...Why Mariah Carey is a Better Brand Than You (or 5 Things Brands Can Learn fro...
Why Mariah Carey is a Better Brand Than You (or 5 Things Brands Can Learn fro...
360i
?

More from 360i (20)

Smart Hardware Cheatsheet
Smart Hardware CheatsheetSmart Hardware Cheatsheet
Smart Hardware Cheatsheet
?
The DEN Atlanta
The DEN AtlantaThe DEN Atlanta
The DEN Atlanta
?
The DEN Chicago
The DEN ChicagoThe DEN Chicago
The DEN Chicago
?
360i's Digital Education for Nonprofits (the den) Recap Report
360i's Digital Education for Nonprofits (the den) Recap Report360i's Digital Education for Nonprofits (the den) Recap Report
360i's Digital Education for Nonprofits (the den) Recap Report
?
360i SXSW Interactive 2016 Roundup
360i SXSW Interactive 2016 Roundup 360i SXSW Interactive 2016 Roundup
360i SXSW Interactive 2016 Roundup
?
360i SXSW Cheat-Sheet
360i SXSW Cheat-Sheet360i SXSW Cheat-Sheet
360i SXSW Cheat-Sheet
?
Social Platform Cheat Sheet February 2016
Social Platform Cheat Sheet February 2016 Social Platform Cheat Sheet February 2016
Social Platform Cheat Sheet February 2016
?
The 2016 CES Report: The Trend Behind the Trend
The 2016 CES Report: The Trend Behind the TrendThe 2016 CES Report: The Trend Behind the Trend
The 2016 CES Report: The Trend Behind the Trend
?
Social platform cheat_sheet 4.0
Social platform cheat_sheet 4.0 Social platform cheat_sheet 4.0
Social platform cheat_sheet 4.0
?
Marketing Leadership Playbook 2015
Marketing Leadership Playbook 2015Marketing Leadership Playbook 2015
Marketing Leadership Playbook 2015
?
Social platform cheat_sheet_august_2015
Social platform cheat_sheet_august_2015Social platform cheat_sheet_august_2015
Social platform cheat_sheet_august_2015
?
Social platform cheat_sheet_may_2015
Social platform cheat_sheet_may_2015Social platform cheat_sheet_may_2015
Social platform cheat_sheet_may_2015
?
2015 SXSW Interactive Recap
2015 SXSW Interactive Recap2015 SXSW Interactive Recap
2015 SXSW Interactive Recap
?
360i SXSW Cheat-sheet
360i SXSW Cheat-sheet360i SXSW Cheat-sheet
360i SXSW Cheat-sheet
?
360i's Branded Video Content Cheat-sheet
360i's Branded Video Content Cheat-sheet360i's Branded Video Content Cheat-sheet
360i's Branded Video Content Cheat-sheet
?
360i's 2015 International CES Hot List
360i's 2015 International CES Hot List360i's 2015 International CES Hot List
360i's 2015 International CES Hot List
?
Social Platform Cheat Sheet
Social Platform Cheat SheetSocial Platform Cheat Sheet
Social Platform Cheat Sheet
?
Global Twitter Trends: Brazil
Global Twitter Trends: BrazilGlobal Twitter Trends: Brazil
Global Twitter Trends: Brazil
?
360i Culture Slideware
360i Culture Slideware360i Culture Slideware
360i Culture Slideware
?
Why Mariah Carey is a Better Brand Than You (or 5 Things Brands Can Learn fro...
Why Mariah Carey is a Better Brand Than You (or 5 Things Brands Can Learn fro...Why Mariah Carey is a Better Brand Than You (or 5 Things Brands Can Learn fro...
Why Mariah Carey is a Better Brand Than You (or 5 Things Brands Can Learn fro...
?

360i Report: The Future of Viewability

  • 1. The Future of Viewability November 2012 Executive Summary Ad viewability has emerged as a core challenge for marketers hoping to quantify and validate their online display investment. Given the advancements in technology that often outpace our ability to measure it, online advertising has lagged in its ability to assure that an impression does in fact mean that a user has viewed the creative. This is of chief concern for brands that are paying for ad space on a CPM basis, in which a “below the fold” impression may be counted without considering viewability. Online ad viewability is a complex concept with several stakeholders ranging from brands and agencies to ad networks and measurement vendors. The “Making Measurement Make Sense” (3MS) initiative was created last year under the leadership of key industry organizations such as the IAB, the 4As, the ANA and MediaLink. The core purpose of this partnership is “to propose standards for metrics and advertising currency that will enhance evaluation of digital media and facilitate cross-platform comparison for brand marketing.” The existence of this consortium of influential industry stakeholders is critical towards advancing key standardization initiatives and ensuring widespread participation and adoption. This spring, 3MS engaged Bain Consulting and the Media Ratings Council (MRC) to manage a pilot program focused on the topic of ad viewability, of which 360i was an active participant. Key Takeaways 1 The viewable ad impressions metric is a necessary evolution to the online advertising model. Adoption of the ad viewability metric will ensure marketers understand the real impact of their media investment. Brand marketers paying top-dollar for high-quality inventory will be able to confirm that their investment garners strong ad view, and direct response advertisers will be able to track viewability levels against conversion- oriented results. 2 Measuring viewability is an ongoing pursuit that will be pushed forward by innovators, with greater polish and evolution emerging as more people adopt the new metrics. As for now, the pilot uncovered challenges that must be overcome before ad viewability will be embraced. For example, the number of impressions that could not be measured for viewability poses a significant challenge. This and other challenges underscore the need for further investigation before viewable impressions can become an accepted metric pan-industry. 3 The implications of a standardized viewability metric are substantial and tremendously positive for publishers and consumers alike. The ad viewability metric will shift how the industry perceives the monetization of online real estate. As the finite world of TV inventory commands higher CPMs, a more “scarce” supply of premium online inventory (as determined by high viewability rates) will likely do the same as it simultaneously improves the consumer experience by de-cluttering web pages. 1 ? 360i LLC. All Rights Reserved.
  • 2. 360i fully embraces the efforts being made by 3MS to advance the cause for better measurement and standardization in digital media. Viewability is a pivotal component that will allow marketers to collectively evolve into a more apples-to-apples cross channel attribution system, which is the Holy Grail of successful marketing. This report will outline the challenge of viewability and share key results from the pilot program. Introduction: What is Viewability? Online advertising has pressed for progress in nearly every medium when it comes to driving advanced accountability and trackability, but there is one area where the industry has fallen blatantly short – ad viewability. What is the value of an online ad unit if no one ever sees it? This challenge is the chief reason why 3MS was established in 2011. As you consider the origins of viewability as a meaningful metric, take a look at the screenshot below, which shows the bottom third of the CNN.com homepage. If a user never scrolls all the way down the page, he or she will never see these ad units. Yet standard ad-serving technologies still count this ad load as an impression, and potentially assign conversion credit on a post-view basis – regardless of whether the ad was truly ever in view. The 3MS initiative was created to enhance and standardize digital metrics and establish a measurement governance model that allows for cross-platform comparison. As part of this effort, the group has created “5 Guiding Principles of Digital Measurement.” The first principle, regarding a new standard of viewable impressions, serves as the core focus of this report. Principle #1 – Move to a “viewable impressions” standard and count real exposures online. Today we count “served impressions” as recorded by ad servers. Often, ad units are not in a viewable space to the end-user or fail to fully load on the screen – potentially resulting in substantial over-counting of impressions. Viewable exposures are increasingly the norm across other media and better address the needs of brand marketers. (Source: 3MS) 2
  • 3. The following section outlines 360i’s participation in the 3MS agency pilot program related to viewability. About the 3MS Pilot Program The primary goal of the 3MS initiative is to phase out the industry’s dependence on the ad impressions-served metric and replace it with the viewable impressions metric. The viewable impressions metric, as preliminarily defined during publisher pilot programs, focuses on two factors: area and duration. By this standard, a viewable impression is reported when at least 50 percent of the ad content on a web page is within the visible area of the viewer's browser window for one second or more. Supervised by the Media Ratings Council (MRC), the agency-focused pilot was designed to uncover and address several aspects of the proposed transition to a viewable impression. The pilot was designed to assess advertiser campaigns in live environments and test viewable impression parameters in order to better understand measurement limitations. Several agencies were selected to participate (including 360i), alongside measurement and ad serving providers, during a trial period in May-June 2012. MRC provided pilot management support and unbiased analysis of the pilot results. A total of 17 advertisers and 12 agencies participated in pilot across 22 campaigns, representing more than 3 billion served impressions that ran in variety of different environments. Results & Reactions Data released by the MRC to pilot participants revealed the following key findings. 1. Viewability rates – or, the percentage of impressions for which the viewable/non-viewable status was determined – varied widely by campaign; from a high of 78.6 percent to a low of 7.3 percent. The graph below shows varying viewability rates across 22 campaigns measured in this study. Viewable Rate 100% 90% 78.6% 80% 66.6% 68.1% 67.1% 70% 58.3% 57.4% 58.3% 60% 50% 43.7% 41.1% 43.4% 44.3% 38.3% 38.4% 38.4% 40% 33.7% 26.7% 27.1% 30% 21.0% 14.7% 15.1% 15.7% 20% 7.3% 10% 0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Campaign 2. The percentage of served impressions measured for viewability ranged from a low of 0 percent to a high of 76.7 percent. Note: In this chart, the X-axis still represents campaigns, but this time using 3
  • 4. letters since the chart above and this one are not one-to-one. Some participants sharing viewability results did not share measurability results, resulting in a discrepancy in the total number of campaigns tracked. Measured Rate 100% 90% 76.7% 80% 68.5% 70% 62.9% 59.7% 60% 50% 40% 34.1% 32.9% 26.0% 27.3% 30% 17.2% 15.7% 16.1% 20% 14.4% 12.6% 10% 0.0% 2.8% 0% A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O Campaign 3. Cross-domain iFrames presented a significant challenge to viewability measurement; they were the cause of the 73.1 percent of the unmeasured impressions in Network and 37.3 percent of unmeasured impressions in Publisher placements. Unmeasured Impressions Percentage within Cross-Domain iFrames 100% 90% 26.9% 80% 70% 62.7% 60% 50% 40% 73.1% 30% 20% 37.3% 10% 0% Network Placements Publisher Placements % in iFrames % not in iFrames 4
  • 5. 4. Network placements in pilot programs generally had lower measured and viewable rates. Network Placements vs. Publisher Placements 60% 55.2% 50% 40% 32.1% 30% 26.8% 18.9% 20% 10% 0% Measured Rate Viewable Rate Network Placement Publisher Placement 5. Viewable rates in pilot programs varied by ad size. Viewable Rates by Ad Unit Size 70% 63.7% 58.8% 60% 52.5% 49.0% 50% 40.0% 40% 30% 19.8% 20% 12.6% 10% 0.0% 0% 160x600 180x150 300x250 728x90 Network Placement Publisher Placement The number of impressions that could not be measured for viewability poses a significant problem. Across some campaigns, that figure exceeded the number of viewable and non-viewable impressions combined. Measured impression rates showed no similarities across campaigns and were very low in some cases. The majority of unmeasured impressions were the result of cross-domain iFrames, due to the viewable impression code being served through a different domain than the publisher’s site. If the domain of the iFrame is different from the domain of the page, the impression is not measurable. Network placements were affected more negatively by cross-domain iFrames than the publisher placements. Moreover, a portion of unmeasured impressions could not be attributed to any known fact. Other contributing factors to the unmeasurable served impressions were that not all viewable vendors met the 17 validation criteria, 5
  • 6. or the viewable decision tags failed to “fire.” In addition to the problem of measurability, campaigns’ viewability rates varied greatly across campaigns, suggesting that strategies to maximize viewability have a long way to go. The pilot revealed the challenges ahead and underscored the need for further investigation before viewable impressions can become an accepted metric across the industry. Like all aspects of digital advertising, measuring viewability is a technical challenge that requires perfecting before marketers can accurately and confidently calculate the impressions that are truly viewable. In the case of not being able to measure served impressions 100 percent, the industry will need to come to a level of measurability that is at least projectable. Currently, there are too many unknowns to make informed projections. Measuring viewability is also an accountability challenge. Unfortunately, not all vendors participating in the pilot were able to meet the validation criteria. Maximizing viewability will not only require additional studies, but the assurance that viewability measurers are validated under and held to strict guidelines. As more served impressions can be measured for viewability, a fuller understanding of viewability rates and the finalization of an industry standard will be in closer reach. Implications This pilot program is just one phase of the overall evolution that 3MS is hoping to accomplish. The following are what we perceive to be the short and long-term implications of this pilot program on both the digital industry and the overall media landscape: Near-term implications: 1. Key players will push adoption of viewability. Even before the agency pilot program wrapped, industry leaders in research and measurement has already begun to push usage of the new metric. For example, comScore is working with agencies on partnerships that incorporate viewability into campaign measurement, and AdSafe is also offering a viewability product. Even some publishers, such as ESPN, are experimenting with viewable currency models. As more credible vendors promote this concept, viewability will become a part of our industry’s common vernacular. 2. Marketers will benefit from enhanced optimization and negotiation tools. For both brand and direct response-oriented campaigns, marketers will have new insight into their display investment. Brand advertisers who pay premium CPMs for high-quality inventory will be able to ensure that their investments are garnering strong ad view (and publishers will be able to adjust CPMs accordingly). The effects will be more palpable for direct response campaigns, where ad viewability proved to fall at lower percentages due to the relatively low viewability rates for networks as compared to premium publishers (32 vs. 55 percent). Media professionals would be well-served to compare their network viewability levels against their conversion-oriented results. If a correlation exists, this is something that can be used for strategic optimizations designed to enhance the efficiencies of the campaign. As less wasteful ad impressions are served, potential monetary savings on the ad serving front may be achieved, and ultimately less conversion overlap. 6
  • 7. Long-term implications: 1. Ad technologies will evolve to allow for better measures of viewability. As noted above, one of the more unintended findings from the pilot program was the extreme gap in measurable vs. unmeasurable impressions. Since this is the basic foundation for widespread adoption of viewability standards, the IAB is working to resolve issues related to cross-domain iFrames that render viewability impossible. The solution currently under way is a “safe iFrame,” which the IAB intends to release on Nov. 5, and has already begun distributing to agency ad operations teams, including that of 360i. 2. The industry will migrate towards the digital GRP. According to the 3MS website, as early as November 2012, marketers should begin to see digital gross rating points (GRPs) take form beyond some initial experimented use by comScore (vGRP) and Nielsen (eGRP). The IAB predicts broad industry adoption by April 2013. This will only be possible with the adoption of a standardized viewable impression metric. 3. Publishers and agencies will begin to favor scarcity. An enormous positive outcome that will stem from this new way of thinking about ad impressions is that the industry will shift its current approach to the monetization of online real estate. A recent ClickZ article highlights an interesting notion that traditional advertisers are well accustomed to, which is that the finite universe of TV inventory is what commands its high CPMs. Conversely, the seemingly boundless display impression universe has translated to a system where online advertising has perhaps “overmonetized” its real estate, thus driving overall CPMs downwards. As marketers begin to press for a higher level of confirmed viewable ad impressions, we will ultimately de-emphasize waste and re-prioritize only the most valuable inventory. While the possibility of a more seamless integration of cross-channel metrics is a huge boon for marketers, it’s important to not overlook what just might be the most profound potential impact of a new viewability metric: how it may change the experience for consumers. As this industry matures, much like other mediums have had to do, there comes a time to reassess and perhaps “un-think” some of the bad habits developed over time – for online advertising, this means cluttered web pages. Viewability has the potential to shift the entire way of thinking around how a website is designed and optimized for a positive ad experience. As a practical move forward, 360i will be actively incorporating measurement tools and technologies into media recommendations as appropriate for clients and will continue to monitor the space for any further outcomes stemming from this pilot program. Next Steps Our recommendations for some quick wins that marketers can take as far as incorporating viewability into their campaigns are as follows: ? Prioritize campaigns which are heavily direct response-oriented. These are the campaigns where the highest shortfall in viewability was evident. ? Partner with a research company who offers a viewable impression validation suite. Both RealVu and comScore are accredited by the MRC, and others have actively participated in the pilot indicating they are likely to follow. 7
  • 8. ? Factor viewed impressions into optimizations. While it may be a longer road towards negotiating based on a paid viewed impression, marketers and agencies are in the driver’s seat in terms of controlling campaign budgets. About 360i 360i is an award-winning digital marketing agency that drives results for Fortune 500 marketers through insights, ideas and technologies. 360i helps its clients think differently about their online presence and evolve their strategies to take advantage of the new world of marketing communications – one where brands and consumers engage in interactive and multi-directional conversations. In 2010, Ad Age named 360i to its prestigious Agency A- List. Current clients include Kraft Foods, JCPenney, Coca-Cola, NBC Universal and Diageo, among others. For more information, please visit www.360i.com or follow us on Twitter @360i. Ways To Connect With 360i 360i.com/reports blog.360i.com twitter.com/360i editor@360i.com 8
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news